
Caribbean history is fascinating. From a European perspective, extremely sobering, because of all the brutality, inhumanity, and extraction that Europeans engaged in over centuries, yet in the present, we pretend this has nothing to do with us. We pride ourselves in the enlightenment tradition of valuing each human equally – well, except the non-European humans. Caribbean people know exactly what this means on the other end: dehumanization and genocide. I tread carefully on this topic; but I am also very interested in it.
The scholar I first read on this is Sidney Mintz (2010) Three Ancient Colonies. Caribbean Themes and Variations. He is (was – passed in 2015) such an exciting anthropologist. I thought of this book, which is written in the most accessible and gripping style, as knowledge accumulated over a lifetime of listening research, because he immerses himself so thoroughly into the realities he studies, and then he connects them to broad developments. In his words, the Caribbean is the world region with the longest tradition of colonization, and the plantation economy defined the social and economic fabric in the Caribbean – this has repercussions in everyday practices to this day. The book delves into Jamaica, Haiti and Puerto Rico, and while Trinidad and Tobago falls into this general description, the country’s history is actually quite different from those three (Tobago is closer to the “classical” slave plantation story).
As for Trinbagonian history, I have looked into two writers in particular: the first is Eric Williams, eminent historian and “father of the nation” who led T and T into independence. He is such a fascinating character, more on him another time. He wrote a book in 1962 – listen up, academic friends, supposedly in ONE month – about the country’s history to be completed in time for Independence Day. And the second is Bridget Brereton, I think the first female Trinidadian professor of history. Fantastic scholar. Here is some of what I learned from them (I think I will make this several installments, just as a heads up).
First, the two islands of this twin island state have VERY distinct histories before they became “united” in the late 19th century. Tobago is really the junior partner in this union, as only about 60,000 out of the 1.4 million citizens live there. I focus therefore on the history of Trinidad. Yes, that name sounds Spanish! Columbus himself called the island by that name because of the three summits in the Southern mountain range he spotted when landing in July 1498. Of course, several Amerindian tribes were living on the island and they called it “Iere”. This means “land of the hummingbirds” because 18 species of hummingbirds inhabit the island (these birds are gorgeous – check out these photos by Theo Ferguson, owner of Yerette – Home of the hummingbirds).

Also, if you have a look at the country’s coat of arms which was designed for independence in 1962, you can see: a) the three mountains, Columbus’ three ships – and two hummingbirds. The two big birds on that coat of arms are the national birds of Trinidad (Scarlet ibis) and Tobago (Cocrico).
I also noticed that hummingbird visuals are often used as positive national symbols, as seen here by the post office and the public wifi provider:


Back to history: The Spanish were very busy “discovering”, which explains why, after this first landing, it took them one century to establish a first settlement on Trinidad in 1592. They had found other, more interesting places in the new world and had only limited manpower, so Trinidad fell by the wayside. Nonetheless, the indigenous population was already decimated during this time due to slave raids (they were then shipped to other islands and the South American mainland).
In the next 200 years, until the 1780s, not much happens. Partly, because hardly any Spanish settlers are actually there, and they don’t have the means to “develop” the island. In other words, they were practically subsistence farmers and did NOT establish slave plantations which were in full swing in the French, British, and Dutch Caribbean colonies at the time. Good for the Amerindians, one would like to think, but they were still forced to work for the Spanish, but all of this happened on a much smaller scale and their population declined slower than in other places. The few Spanish settlers tried to complain to the Crown about how neglected they were – decades passed without a Spanish ship sailing by! – but without much success. So they helped themselves by trading with Dutch and British ships which frequented the region much more often. This was strictly forbidden by imperial law, but hey – if no Spanish ship ever comes by, how is Spain going to enforce this rule? In exchange for some important equipment such as knifes and hoes, they sold cocoa and tobacco which they cultivated in modest amounts.
The coexistence between Spaniards and the indigenous people was of course full of tensions. The labor regime was brutal, and there were some Amerindian revolts. Many also withdrew from Spanish settlements and retreated into the jungle. But there was significant direct contact, and that produced some mixed population. It might be that some of this was not the result of direct force, but in general, this “mixing” seems to be most aptly described as systemic rape. But I also found it interesting to learn that until the late 18th century, the indigenous population was much larger than the Spanish settlers (Brereton speaks about 2000 Amerindians and just a few hundred Europeans in the 1770s).
In the 1770s, the Crown finally realizes that it needs non-Spanish help to make something out of Trinidad. Because it was adamant that additional settlers had to be Catholic it provided incentives for French planters from other Caribbean islands to come in and develop the island. Some other islands such as Grenada had just changed hands from French to British rule, so this offer was attractive to French settlers. The arrival of these dynamic people with their slaves, capital, and planter expertise impressed the Spanish crown, produced a culture shock for the local Spanish hillbilly-type settlers, and led to the institutionalization of Spain’s new immigration policy via the 1783 Cedula of population. This happened parallel to drastic changes in Haiti (then Saint Domingue), the most lucrative French colony at the time, which led to several waves of refugees from Haiti flocking to Trinidad.
It is safe to say that after three centuries of “backwater existence”, EVERYTHING changed in Trinidad in less than 20 years. The French soon outnumber the Spanish, and the imported slaves become the largest segment of the population (over 50%, which is still much less than in the traditional plantation societies of Barbados or Jamaica). The island turns into a plantation economy with sugar becoming the dominant crop next to smaller crops like cocoa, coffee and cotton.
And here some connection to an individual in this process: We travelled yesterday to a village in the Northern mountain range called Lopinot. It is named after Charles Joseph Count de Loppinot, a Lieutenant-General in the French Army and sugar planter in Saint Domingue who came to Trinidad in 1800 with his family and about 100 slaves. He settled and started a cocoa plantation – the estate home still exists and is being preserved.

I was struck by this stark discrepancy – the utter beauty of the place. And its brutal history as a slave plantation.


Back to the late 18th/ early 19th century. Two fascinating developments: First, the Cedula of Population was not limited to white Catholics, but also extended to colored and black freedmen, as long as they were Catholic. They did not get the exact same incentives as whites (e.g. less land), but this treatment was still the most favorable to them in ANY Caribbean island. For those who don’t know: Caribbean plantation societies such as Saint Domingue/ Haiti were much more complex than just white planters and black slaves; there was a lot of race-mixing and in that process, many colored and black people were freed; some of them were themselves slave owners. So, among the French settlers that came to Trinidad, the majority was colored or black; they were typically not planters, but skilled laborers and artisans. Within this French influx, there were different types of people: first came conservative French royalists; they left Saint Domingue after the French revolution which, for a short time, upended the hierarchical order on the island. In a second wave, supporters of the Republican cause left Haiti after the old order was restored on the island. On the receiving end, the elites in Trinidad did not want to hear anything of revolution. They were very supportive of conservative immigrants and suspicious of those thinking in more equality-oriented terms (automatically, the colored and black immigrants were assumed to fall into that category).
Second development: This fear, plus the closer alliance of Spain with France (which was considered problematic from the perspective of Trinidadian planters), plus the long-established interests of Britain on the island due to the presence of British traders … leads, by the end of the 18th century, to the British takeover of the island. Spain reluctantly concedes; the islanders are “happy” (some more, some less – during British rule, the situation gets MUCH worse for colored and black freedmen).
Britain then does a paradoxical thing: it accelerates the establishment of a REAL slave economy (because remember that this process was very recent in Trinidad); BUT: because abolitionist sentiments in Britain become stronger and stronger, it also tries to create a kind of “model slavery” that is more organized and somewhat less brutal. However, this does not work out; according to Eric Williams, during these first decades of the 19th century, the profitability of slavery also declines drastically; and, as a result, Britain abolishes slavery in 1834. Are enslaved people freed as a result? No. They are instead transferred into a new system called “apprenticeship” which continues much of the same but is apparently as much as the planters can handle. Legal emancipation falls into the year 1838.
You will not be surprised to hear that this is NOT the end of labor exploitation, but I think you deserve a break. Next historical post will proceed after 1838. Meanwhile, enjoy some guilt-free hot cocoa – because if it is from Trinidad, it is not only the BEST in the world, but also, historically, post-emancipation cocoa cultivation was much less exploitative than sugar and often community-based. Was this a positive enough spin to a post filled with dreadful brutality? I sure hope so.









